Home :: FAQ :: Login
Album list :: Last uploads :: Last comments :: Most viewed :: Top rated :: My Favorites :: Search


Home > Members galleries > George > George's Album
Click to view full size image
Hope Park
Hope Park in Keswick Lake District.
File information
Album name:George / George's Album
Rating (1 votes): (Details)
Keywords:hope park keswick
Camera:Canon 5D MkII
Lens:Canon 24-105 L IS USM
Editing Performed:Converted in Lr, than a touch of Glow in Coilour Efex Pro.usm slight crop, clone out a traffic bollard and re-size.
File Size:719 KB
Date added:Jul 07, 2014
Dimensions:2000 x 1109 pixels
Displayed:35 times
Color Space:Uncalibrated
Customer Render:0
Date Time:2014:07:07 17:42:59
DateTime Original:2014:06:30 22:35:55
DateTime digitized:2014:06:30 22:35:55
Exif Image Height:1109 pixels
Exif Image Width:2000 pixels
Exif Offset:284
Exif Version:version 2.21
Exposure Bias:0 EV
Exposure Mode:1
Exposure Program:Manual
Exposure Time:15/1 sec
FNumber:f 10
Flash:No Flash
Focal length:24 mm
Max Aperture:f 4
Metering Mode:Partial
Model:Canon EOS 5D Mark II
Orientation:Normal (O deg)
Resolution Unit:Inch
Scene Capture Mode:0
Software:Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Macintosh)
White Balance:0
X Resolution:300
Y Resolution:300
IPTC Title:
IPTC Copyright:
IPTC Category:
Favorites:Add to Favorites
Beermonsta  [Jul 07, 2014 at 08:31 PM]
Must be viewed full size to appreciate the detail, An excellent image George, The lighting has been perfectly controlled both in the taking and editing of this, giving great highlights and shadows in all the right places and lovely detail right through the image. Excellent work and one to sit back, view full screen and enjoy
Helen  [Jul 08, 2014 at 12:13 AM]
This certainly must be viewed at full screen to enjoy & to take in the full details. An excellent shot & edited with superb details & lighting. I have never been here on a night time just through the day. I bet this would be lovely printed & put in a frame & hung on your wall George. I could look at this all day so a well deserved ten from me.
alanuk  [Jul 08, 2014 at 12:57 PM]
I'm glad you posted it here as I could not quite work out all the different elements when I saw it elsewhere; the larger size makes such a difference to one's appreciation. I like the use of the light here, both natural and artificial. When I saw it originally, it gave me a feeling of Hitchcok's Bates Motel as little of the warmth came though; now I can see it in a very light and it looks far more welcoming. For me, I think it's a pity that the large hangs down so low and obscures part of the buildings beyond. Once you've been back with your chainsaw, I look forward to seeing a repost
JOHN  [Jul 08, 2014 at 03:37 PM]
A cracking dusk shot, not quite night I think, it struck me that it must have been very calm, a 15sec exposure and no movement to be seen in the branches.
I like the little star bursts picked up by the lights, and some fine detail to be seen.
It is a pity about the branch of the tree, would it have been possible to get the other side of it George? Perhaps not.
Anyway a super photo none the less, well done.
SteveT  [Jul 09, 2014 at 04:57 PM]
At full screen this is very good lots of detail and interest, well taken and edited.
Photojunkie  [Jul 12, 2014 at 11:59 AM]
It's wonderful full-screen George. Thought it was quite an unusual layout and I couldn't work it out in the thumbprint but it comes to life when you enlarge it. Agree that the overhanging branches interfere with the buildings behind. Love how you do your night-shots, the lighting is lovely.. little pockets and pools and star-bursts of light everywhere, very Ethereal. Agree with Helen that you should hang this up!
It's nice to see all the detail in everyones enlargements, but it's a shame that it gets too large sometimes, to see how everything relates to everything else without having to scroll across !
George  [Jul 12, 2014 at 02:00 PM]
Jeffrey if I had moved to clad the overhanging branches I would have lost the twin arch and street lamp which I wanted in the shot
Barbara what screen resolution do you run at?
Photojunkie  [Jul 12, 2014 at 10:48 PM]
George it's 1920 x 1080 (Recommended) ?
(I suppose my screen is small compared to some - it's a 21" and more rectangle than square (10" x19" )
George  [Jul 13, 2014 at 10:15 AM]
OK I'll remember that in future and re-size to 1920 as it is a bit of a pain having to scroll to see all the photo.